Eviquire for
Law firms
Eviquire helps legal teams preserve online material in a structured evidence package that records what was collected, where it appeared, when it was acquired, and how its integrity can be checked.
Web evidence workflows forLaw firms
The challenge
Why online evidence needs a defined process
A screenshot may omit the URL, source resources, surrounding page, access conditions, examiner actions, or integrity records needed to authenticate and explain online material later.
Relevant sources
Evidence your team may need to preserve
- Websites, notices, claims, policies, and contractual terms
- Social posts, comments, profiles, and video
- Marketplace listings, advertisements, and seller pages
- Authorized portals, messages, and downloadable records
Common scenarios
Where Eviquire fits
- Pre-action preservation and litigation holds
- Disclosure, discovery, arbitration, and expert instruction
- Defamation, fraud, employment, commercial, and IP disputes
Role-specific value
How Eviquire supports law firms
Full-page, scrolling, linked-page, and multimedia capture
Source archives, downloads, metadata, and session context
Evidence comments, hashes, timestamps, and custody records
Custom-branded reports and portable review packages
Recommended workflow
From collection objective to reviewable output
Define the objective
Record the investigative purpose, authority, relevant sources, target dates, access conditions, and collection boundaries.
Prepare the environment
Select the appropriate desktop, cloud, virtual, network, language, and case settings for the source and organizational policy.
Acquire relevant material
Capture the content, interactions, files, media, source context, and technical information needed to explain the finding.
Verify and review
Check hashes and timestamps, review acquisition activity, document gaps or failures, and keep the original evidence package protected.
Report and hand off
Create a clear case record for the authorized reviewer, separating captured facts from analysis, allegations, and conclusions.
See it in the product
Give counsel and experts a coherent record to review.
For a legal matter, the useful question is whether the preserved online material remains connected to its source context, acquisition record, and reporting output. Screenshots show a non-customer demonstration environment; actual outputs depend on the source, workflow, configuration, platform, plan, and permissions.
What was collected in the case?
The review workspace can connect captured artifacts to their acquisition and case context, rather than leaving a reviewer with disconnected files.
How is the collection session documented?
An acquisition report can present the session summary, package integrity values, available records, and linked evidence items for review.
Evidence outputs
Material another reviewer can inspect
Eviquire organizes captured content and acquisition records so the collection can be reviewed without relying on memory or a disconnected screenshot.
- Complete page and publication context
- Visible and underlying source material
- Acquisition method and integrity records
- Counsel- and expert-reviewable reports
Deployment choices
Select the environment that fits the work.
Desktop
Suitable when the examiner needs local control, virtual-machine support, specialist source access, extended acquisitions, or sensitive case handling.
Cloud SaaS
Suitable for browser-based access and centrally available workflows when source support, policy, sensitivity, and plan limits allow it.
Hybrid or on-premise
Available for teams that require combined workflows, custom limits, controlled infrastructure, or government and enterprise deployment.
A documented process supports—but does not replace—professional judgment.
Eviquire helps preserve selected online material and acquisition records. Your organization remains responsible for authority, scope, validation, privacy, security, interpretation, retention, disclosure, and compliance with the applicable rules.
Frequently asked questions
Does Eviquire guarantee admissibility?
No. Admissibility and evidential weight depend on the applicable rules, facts, authentication, collection method, and supporting testimony.
Can collected cases be shared with experts?
Portable review outputs can support controlled handoff to counsel or experts while the original evidence package remains protected.